<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Planet Nectarius &#187; Aperture Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nectarius.net/tag/aperture-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nectarius.net</link>
	<description>Nectarines are tasty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:58:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Thinking about a sequal to Portal</title>
		<link>http://nectarius.net/2007/12/26/thinking-about-a-sequal-to-portal/</link>
		<comments>http://nectarius.net/2007/12/26/thinking-about-a-sequal-to-portal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 06:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aperture Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Mesa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlaDOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nectarius.net/2007/12/26/thinking-about-a-sequal-to-portal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Portal 2 would have some really high expectations to fill. It might even be better if they give it a different title, and just set it around Aperture Science, or Chell. *spoilers for Portal follow* It would be lovely to know more about Chell, but what really makes Portal is GlaDOS. Personally I&#8217;d [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Portal 2 would have some really high expectations to fill. It might even be better if they give it a different title, and just set it around Aperture Science, or Chell.</p>
<p>*spoilers for Portal follow*</p>
<p>It would be lovely to know more about Chell, but what really makes Portal is GlaDOS. Personally I&#8217;d really like to find out more about when GlaDOS first flooded the enrichment centre with toxic case. The time when the red phone&#8217;s cord was cut (the commentary says the phone was to be used if GlaDOS became too aware, in which case she&#8217;d be shut off or something).</p>
<p>Something that would be cool, is finding out more about Aperture Science&#8217;s relationship to Black Mesa. I&#8217;d like to play out some sort of conflict between them, a lovely twist would be having GlaDOS helping you throughout, yet somehow you realise at the end that you&#8217;ve provided her with the trigger for her awareness and subsequent madness.</p>
<p>If aperturescience.com is to be taken as canon Aperture Science started off making shower curtains for the military (not sure which military), then the man in charge left 3 directives for the future of the company. The first 2 were absurd nutty things, the 3rd was to make a bio artificial intelligence lifeform operating system or something, which was really an aside as he hadn&#8217;t put much thought into it. Obviously the 3rd ended up being GlaDOS.</p>
<p>No matter what Valve does, Portal will be a hard act to follow.<br />
They absolutely much keep the same voice actress for GlaDOS, she&#8217;s wonderful.<br />
Just another 3-4 hours puzzle game would be fabulous too though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nectarius.net/2007/12/26/thinking-about-a-sequal-to-portal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

